
PORTSMOUTH — Delinquent students might have to start attending Saturday School. The suggested disciplinary measure was debated Monday night between parents, officials and students alike.
Tim Steele, a school board member, proposed the new policy in an effort to force students to learn about respect and responsibility at Portsmouth High School.
“I hope the threat of Saturday classes will make the students think twice before breaking school rules,” he said.
The sessions would begin at 8 a.m. and end at noon during the year. The program would cost taxpayers $3,000 per year in staffing.
Opposition arose during the discussion when Peggy Bacon, a parent, thought it was outrageous to inconvenience working parents.
“It’s bad enough to get my son off to school Monday through Friday,” she said. “Why should I have to worry about Saturday as well?”
The program would not make a difference for the students and ruin weekends for families, said Bacon.
Lisa Gallagher, a high school student, echoed Bacon’s resistance. She said if the program was implemented only faculty would benefit and students could rebel against the system – possibly skipping the Saturday sessions altogether.
If that was the case, Gallagher asked, “what are they going to go, make them stay all weekend?”
Steele replied to both Bacon and Gallagher’s concerns. He said that proposal would act as an instigator to reduce the number of in-house suspensions and students would not be allowed back into school if a Saturday session was missed.
He did, however, acknowledge the policy would not be ideal for parents, but emphasized the need to reform inappropriate behavior on school grounds.
Bob Farley, a resident, agreed with Steele’s suggestion. He said that news rules were necessary for children to regain a sense of responsibility.
“Maybe if they have to miss a few Saturday morning cartoons they’ll start wising up,” he said.
One of the major discipline problems present at the school is unlawful smoking.
In 1995, 154 students were placed under in-house suspensions for smoking. They were unable to make up class work and had to remain under the supervision of a staff member for a full day in an empty classroom.
Steele said the new program would allow disobedient students to stay up-to-date with their work while hopefully embracing the importance of following school rules.
“I just want to keep students from smoking in the high school bathrooms,” he said.
The board voted 5-3 and will hold another meeting on March 7. Steele is required to return with figures on the number of in-house school detentions this year.
In other business, Nathan Greenberg, Superintendent of Schools, delivered an administrative report focusing on the School Department’s efforts to go forward with a $21 million budget for the next school year. It would be a 5.5 percent increase from this year’s spending.
The School Board approved several school department service bills amounting to $13,568 and discussed four requests from teachers for leaves of absences while considering a retreat for administrators in June.
A financial report was presented to the School Board detailing the implications of federal budget cuts on the school lunch program.
Tim Steele, a school board member, proposed the new policy in an effort to force students to learn about respect and responsibility at Portsmouth High School.
“I hope the threat of Saturday classes will make the students think twice before breaking school rules,” he said.
The sessions would begin at 8 a.m. and end at noon during the year. The program would cost taxpayers $3,000 per year in staffing.
Opposition arose during the discussion when Peggy Bacon, a parent, thought it was outrageous to inconvenience working parents.
“It’s bad enough to get my son off to school Monday through Friday,” she said. “Why should I have to worry about Saturday as well?”
The program would not make a difference for the students and ruin weekends for families, said Bacon.
Lisa Gallagher, a high school student, echoed Bacon’s resistance. She said if the program was implemented only faculty would benefit and students could rebel against the system – possibly skipping the Saturday sessions altogether.
If that was the case, Gallagher asked, “what are they going to go, make them stay all weekend?”
Steele replied to both Bacon and Gallagher’s concerns. He said that proposal would act as an instigator to reduce the number of in-house suspensions and students would not be allowed back into school if a Saturday session was missed.
He did, however, acknowledge the policy would not be ideal for parents, but emphasized the need to reform inappropriate behavior on school grounds.
Bob Farley, a resident, agreed with Steele’s suggestion. He said that news rules were necessary for children to regain a sense of responsibility.
“Maybe if they have to miss a few Saturday morning cartoons they’ll start wising up,” he said.
One of the major discipline problems present at the school is unlawful smoking.
In 1995, 154 students were placed under in-house suspensions for smoking. They were unable to make up class work and had to remain under the supervision of a staff member for a full day in an empty classroom.
Steele said the new program would allow disobedient students to stay up-to-date with their work while hopefully embracing the importance of following school rules.
“I just want to keep students from smoking in the high school bathrooms,” he said.
The board voted 5-3 and will hold another meeting on March 7. Steele is required to return with figures on the number of in-house school detentions this year.
In other business, Nathan Greenberg, Superintendent of Schools, delivered an administrative report focusing on the School Department’s efforts to go forward with a $21 million budget for the next school year. It would be a 5.5 percent increase from this year’s spending.
The School Board approved several school department service bills amounting to $13,568 and discussed four requests from teachers for leaves of absences while considering a retreat for administrators in June.
A financial report was presented to the School Board detailing the implications of federal budget cuts on the school lunch program.


